New vegas however, being a little smaller but with better gameplay mechanics balances out everything that fallout3 had flaws with. Dozens of hours worth of playtime, I played fallout 3 for 300 hours, with all DLC. (Horrible spec's, but if I can get that, you can too!) Anyway, the game is lovingly funny, just a drab landscape. graphics card, and an amd anthlon 64 3500+ processor, with 3.5 gigabytes of DDR ONE ram, with 200 mghz speed. (On the first few days of release) after the patches, its fine. I will admit that the bugs are a miserable thing to live with. In new vegas, its far more oriented towards the rebirth of society. In fallout 3, it is a broken ruin of a once superpower. Fallout 3 is a very different game from new vegas, except for the lovley pip boy and the VATS targeting system. 2 hundred First off, most people giving this bad business blame it on the bugs, and also sway towards fallout 3. … Expandįirst off, most people giving this bad business blame it on the bugs, and also sway towards fallout 3. I you didn't play Fallout 3 but are willing to work through this game's bugs, then I am sure that you'll learn to love it. In summary, If you loved Fallout 3 then you'll love this game. A big plus is the companion wheel this makes managing your companions much easier.
I was a little disappointed with the New Vegas Strip I felt it could have been bigger with a lot more to see and do.
The Mojave wastes seem huge compared to the Capital wastes, with an abundance of familiar settings and a huge array of side quests. This can cause major frustration at times especially when the game decides to completely crash. So I was quite looking forward to the release of New Vegas, and I must say that I wasn't disappointed. The Mojave wastes seem I was a big fan of Fallout 3, losing countless hours in my exploration of the Capital wastes. I was a big fan of Fallout 3, losing countless hours in my exploration of the Capital wastes.
0 kommentar(er)
